Anzeige

Interview with Surgeon General Dr. Johannes Backus

The Bundeswehr Medical Service Command (KdoGesVersBw) unites human medicine, pharmacy, veterinary medicine, and dentistry under one command. As the Bundeswehr’s specialist medical command with troop command responsibility, it integrates outpatient care, medical education and research, health protection, and clinical care into a single, cohesive structure. Through its unique matrix organization, the KdoGesVersBw combines medical expertise with operational leadership, ensuring comprehensive medical support and readiness across all levels of military operations.

“The Golden Hour Isn't Dead!” says Chief Medical Officer Dr. Johannes Backus in an interview with Defence Network
“The Golden Hour Isn't Dead!” says Chief Medical Officer Dr. Johannes Backus in an interview with Defence Network
Picture: Bundeswehr / Erdmann

To begin with, Herr Surgeon General, what are the core tasks of the Medical Service Command?

At the Bundeswehr Medical Service Command (KdoGesVersBw), aspects of human medicine, pharmacy, veterinary medicine, and dentistry are all equally represented. We are the Bundeswehr’s specialist command with simultaneous troop command responsibility for all centrally consolidated medical forces.

As a troop command authority, we lead three pillars:
The first is outpatient care, including all medical facilities for primary care of soldiers, as well as Role 1 medical support forces deployed in operational areas.
The second pillar is the Bundeswehr Medical Academy (SanAkBw), which serves as a training, research, and teaching institution, and as the bearer of capabilities for health protection.
The third pillar comprises clinical care, bringing together all medical units and Bundeswehr hospitals to provide Role 2, 3, and 4 elements of the medical evacuation chain.

We exercise both professional and troop command responsibility through the KdoGesVersBw staff. Troop command tasks—personnel management, materiel management, and operational planning—are handled through the classical staff functional areas. In addition, there are profession-specific responsibilities reflecting the four licensed medical disciplines. Overall, this is organized in a matrix structure closely linked with the Support Command in Bonn, which functions as a Medical Component Command—analogous to Land, Air, and Maritime Component Commands—to integrate medical leadership and expertise into the operational and strategic levels.

And your personal focus as commander? Is there something where you would say: “This is where I am currently driving change”?

Like the Bundeswehr as a whole, the medical service is transitioning to new framework conditions—moving away from nearly 30 years of international crisis management back to the core mission of national and collective defense. This involves providing extraterritorial force elements within alliances.

One of my main priorities is reorganizing the medical service around this core mission, including adjustments to the medical care strategy. At the same time, we must expand medical personnel—a major challenge in terms of training and organization. Capacities must be created in infrastructure, training systems, and attractiveness as an employer. These are my priorities for the next 24 months.

The KdoGesVersBw was established on April 1, 2025, and had to report full operational capability by September 30. This was largely a formal declaration. We operate under the principle “fight tonight” and must absorb increases in personnel and materiel while simultaneously developing and implementing the organizational structure. From 2027 onward, further iterations may be necessary—signs indicate that conflicts along the Eastern European border could intensify.

Are there particular challenges? For example, is recruiting personnel still difficult—keyword “new military service”?

We are fortunate to offer highly attractive professional training programs. The healthcare market still provides opportunities, but the situation is becoming more difficult. Finding suitable personnel for healthcare professions amid demographic change affects the entire healthcare sector. However, we still have good applicant numbers, which we must utilize.

The problem in recent years was structural—we lacked the appropriate number of positions. The Bundeswehr’s 2010 structural decision imposed strict personnel ceilings that constrained us. Without allocated positions and budgetary resources, we were unable to recruit qualified personnel, even when we wanted to.

This has changed significantly over the past year. Now we must capitalize on the favorable situation and bring personnel into training. We also need to develop training concepts to make optimal use of the new military service model.

Speaking of education—you mentioned the Medical Academy as the middle pillar. How is it structured?

The SanAkBw is more than just a school. On one hand, it is a medical training institution offering courses for medical personnel across all career paths and specialized training programs. In the future, we will establish a training center analogous to those of the Army, Air Force, and Navy.

The second component is military medical research and teaching in the classical sense. This includes a newly established master’s program in “Digitalization and Healthcare” in cooperation with the Bundeswehr University Munich, specifically for trained medical personnel. Digitalization is one of the key enabling processes we must advance.

The SanAkBw also oversees departmental research institutes: microbiology, pharmacology and toxicology, radiobiology, and preventive medicine. These conduct specialized research for Germany and its armed forces. Medical CBRN defense is a major focus, where we are globally leading.

In crisis situations, the federal government relies on this expertise—as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Institute of Microbiology served as a reference laboratory for pathogen detection.

And in the field of research?

Two interesting projects:
The first concerns lung ventilation. The lungs play a critical role in respiratory infections, as demonstrated during COVID-19. We are working on improving detection capabilities.

The second focuses on sepsis, a systemic infection. Despite top-level intensive care, sepsis still has about a 30% mortality rate in Germany. We are researching whether early-detectable biomarkers can help intervene before full onset.

A long-term goal is to restore the reputation of military medical research, which was highly regarded before 1945 but later fell behind. To this end, we have established two research networks—North and South—and civilian universities are showing increasing interest in cooperation.

The rescue chain, as it typically operates within the Bundeswehr Medical Service.
The rescue chain, as it typically operates within the Bundeswehr Medical Service.
Graphic: ZSanDstBw

Let’s move from the strategic to the tactical level. Last year, we published an article titled “The Death of the Golden Hour.” It argued that the war in Ukraine suggests the Golden Hour is no longer feasible. What is your view?

It is a provocative thesis, designed to attract attention—and that is legitimate. The concept of the “Golden Hour” has been with us for over 20 years. But I ask: Is there only one Golden Hour? The answer is no.

Military medicine focuses on the specific conditions of combat, which differ significantly from peacetime. It is a component of disaster medicine. The Berlin Breitscheidplatz attack showed that even in peacetime we must be prepared to apply mass-casualty medical principles.

The Golden Hour is a treatment principle describing what must happen within certain timeframes after injury. If interventions are not initiated within these windows, irreversible physiological processes can occur, potentially leading to death.

The key question is whether conditions allow rapid transport to the best possible care facility. In civilian settings, emergency physicians stabilize and transport patients quickly. In military settings, the same applies—but the environment is the battlefield. The goal is rapid stabilization with minimal interventions to enable transport.

But this is precisely what does not work on the battlefield in Ukraine.

The Golden Hour is not always achievable under combat conditions. If air superiority and sufficient resources exist, “scoop and run” is possible—as seen in parts of the Vietnam War. Without these conditions, other concepts must apply, always aiming to stabilize the patient.

In Ukraine, medical facilities themselves are targeted. This leads to countermeasures such as camouflage, protected infrastructure, and nighttime transport. As a result, forward medical care—so-called “prolonged field care”—becomes more important.

What kinds of injuries are we talking about, and what principles apply?

Some injuries are unsurvivable. Others are survivable if treated early—for example, applying a tourniquet or relieving a tension pneumothorax with a needle.

We train all soldiers in such measures. Selected personnel receive advanced training as combat lifesavers. The key point is: statements like “the Golden Hour is dead” oversimplify the issue. It remains one principle among many, alongside others like prolonged field care.

Are these concepts new, or have they been in development for some time?

They have been evolving for years. Specialized forces and NATO partners contributed significantly. The combat lifesaver system has existed since 2010, based on lessons from Afghanistan.

The goal is always to reduce preventable deaths—those who die of wounds but could have been saved.

What are the latest lessons from Ukraine?

A major game changer is the tourniquet. It was once discouraged; today it is standard. “Stop the bleeding” is a core principle.

Another key lesson: bringing blood products forward. This is logistically complex, but the use of whole blood—revived from earlier practices—has proven highly effective and may become another game changer.

How is the Bundeswehr preparing for this?

We are working with national authorities to establish legal and procedural frameworks. We are also simplifying field procedures and considering how to equip different medical units—from foot patrol medics to helicopters and field hospitals.

Additionally, we are exploring drone use—for reconnaissance, protection, and transport of medical supplies and even patients.

What about criticism that drones are easy targets?

No system is completely safe. Modern warfare involves precise space-time calculations and risk assessments, often supported by AI. The same applies to ground systems—detection technologies are constantly improving.

Ultimately, the goal is deterrence: to be strong enough that a potential adversary questions their chances of success.

Herr Surgeon General Dr. Backus, thank you very much for the interview.
The interview was conducted by Navid Linnemann, CPM Verlag GmbH.

 

Wehrmedizin und Wehrpharmazie 1/26

Mit WhatsApp immer auf dem neuesten Stand bleiben!

EN: Subscribe to our WhatsApp channel to receive the latest news directly on your mobile phone. Simply scan the QR code or click on this link.

DE: Abonnieren Sie unseren WhatsApp-Kanal, um die Neuigkeiten direkt auf Ihr Handy zu erhalten. Einfach den QR-Code scannen oder auf diesen Link klicken.

Beitrag teilen

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren

DEF-JOBS

Index