Almanac
United States of America
Surgeon General
7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101
U.S. Military Health System Article
A Summary Description
The U.S. Military Global System of Health Services: Unparalleled Capabilities in Support of Country, Allies, and Partners (February 2023)
Contents
- Profile Editor Contact Details
- Leaders in the Military Health System
- Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
- Joint Staff Surgeon
- Surgeon General of the Army
- Surgeon General of the Navy
- Surgeon General of the Air Force
- Director, Defense Health Agency
- U.S. Defense Health Headquarters Address
- MHS Web Site Links
- Section 1 – National Context and Summary
- A. Geostrategic Situation Overview
- B. Organization of U.S. Department of Defense and Armed Forces
- Section 2 – Organizational Structure
- A. MHS Organization Overview
- B. Health Care in the U.S. & Military Health Care
- Section 3 – Firm Base Health System
- A. Hospital Services
- B. Healthcare beneficiaries
- C. Military Medical Research capabilities
1. Civilian-Military Research Collaboration bodies
2. Trauma and Intensive Care Research
3. Military Medicine Academic Journals
- Section 4 – Operational Capabilities
- A. Overview of Operational Military Medicine Concepts
- B. Medical Operational Capabilities
- C. Overseas & Operational Deployments
1. Overseas Contingency Operations
2. Disaster Relief
3. Multi-National Military Medical Organizations
- Section 5 – Military Medical Personnel
- A. Personnel in the U.S. MHS
- B. Military Medical Recruitment
- C. Military Medical Training
1. Initial Training
2. Collective Training & Exercises
- Section 6 – Civilian-Military Relations
- A. Formal Civ-Mil Agreements
- B. COVID-19 as an Example of Civ-Mil Coordination
- Section 7 – U.S. Military Medical History
- A. Abridged Summary of U.S. Military Medical History
- A. Abridged Summary of U.S. Military Medical History
- References
Leaders in the Military Health System
Leading the U.S. Military Health System (MHS) are the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (ASD[HA]), the Joint Staff Surgeon (JSS) and the Service Surgeons General, and the Director of the Defense Health Agency (DHA). The ASD(HA) is a civilian official who is responsible for overseeing health policy and budgeting across the MHS. The JSS is the chief medical advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and coordinates health services within the Department of Defense. The Service Surgeons General are the senior medical leaders of each military service branch. The DHA is a combat support agency that provides shared health services across the MHS.
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
Ms. Seileen Mullen is currently serving as the Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs. In this role, she is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense and the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness for all Department of Defense health and force health protection policies, programs, and activities.
Link to official biography: Ms. Seileen Mullen | Health.mil
Joint Staff Surgeon
Major General (MD) Paul Friedrichs serves as the Joint Staff Surgeon. He provides medical advice to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Staff and the Combatant Commanders. He coordinates all issues related to health services, to include operational medicine, force health protection and readiness among the combatant commands, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the services.
Link to official biography: Maj. Gen. Paul Friedrichs > Joint Chiefs of Staff > Article View (jcs.mil)
Link to public affairs: Contact Us (jcs.mil)
Surgeon General of the Army
Lieutenant General R. Scott Dingle is The Surgeon General and Commanding General, U.S. Army Medical Command. Prior to assuming the acting position, he served as the Deputy Surgeon General and Deputy Commanding General (Support), U.S. Army Medical Command, from April 2018 to August 2019.
Link to official biography: Lt. Gen. R. Scott Dingle | Health.mil
Surgeon General of the Navy
Rear Admiral (upper half) Bruce L. Gillingham serves as the Surgeon General of the Navy, N093/chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. He has served in various positions throughout Navy Medicine to include director of Pediatric Orthopedic and Scoliosis Surgery; Associate Orthopedic Residency Program director; and director of Surgical Services. While assigned to Naval Medical Center San Diego, he was instrumental in establishing the Comprehensive Combat and Complex Casualty Care Center (C5).
Link to official biography: Rear Adm. Bruce L. Gillingham | Health.mil
Surgeon General of the Air Force
Lieutenant General Robert I. Miller is the Surgeon General, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, and also serves as the Surgeon General of the U.S. Space Force. In this role, he advises the Secretary of the Air Force, the Air Force Chief of Staff, the Space Force Chief of Space Operations and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs on matters pertaining to the medical aspects of the air expeditionary force and the health of Airmen and Guardians.
Link to official biography: Lt. Gen. Robert I. Miller | Health.mil
Director, Defense Health Agency
Lieutenant General Telita Crosland is the Director, Defense Health Agency (DHA), Defense Health Headquarters, Falls Church, Virginia. She leads a joint, integrated Combat Support Agency enabling the Army, Navy, and Air Force medical services to provide a medically ready force and ready medical force to Combatant Commands in both peacetime and wartime.
Link to official biography: Lt. General Telita Crosland | Health.mil
U.S. Defense Health Headquarters Address
Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101
MHS Web Site Links
U.S. Military Health System Official Website: MHS Home | Health.mil
U.S. Army Medical Department Official Website: Home | Army Medicine (health.mil)
U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine Official Website: Home (navy.mil)
U.S. Air Force Medical Service Official Website: The Official Home Page of the AFMS
Section 1 – National Context and Summary
A. Geostrategic Situation Overview
The United States and its allies operate in a progressively complex, ambiguous, and interconnected global security environment that is marked by the increasing threat of great power competition and the constant risk of radicalized transnational and extremist actors. Preparing to respond to all these factors leads to competition for limited resources and leadership attention. This challenging security environment continues to unfold amid the disruption of a recent global pandemic, new and emerging technologies, and the diffusion of world power. These new challenges are interacting in unpredictable ways that will continue to test abilities to respond, but also provide new opportunities to partner with allies on innovative global solutions (Office of the Director of National Intelligence, 2022).
B. Organization of U.S. Department of Defense and Armed Forces
The Department of Defense is America’s defense. The Department’s mission is to provide the military forces needed to deter war and ensure national security. The Department’s traces its history to pre-Revolutionary times and has grown to become America’s largest government agency. See measures in figure 1 below (Department of Defense, 2022).
The Department of Defense is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia in the Pentagon. The Pentagon is the world’s largest low-rise office building. It sits across the Potomac from the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. It holds three times the floor space of the Empire State Building. The iconic five-sided building, pictured in figure 2, finished constructed on 15 January 1943 and hosts the Department to this day.
The Department is organized in a joint structure that is managed by the Secretary of Defense, advised by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), manned by the Services, employed by the Combatant Commands (CCMD), and supported by Combat Support Agencies (CSA). There are six active components of the Armed Forces: Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard. There are twenty CSAs and eleven CCMDs.
Joint operations are led and enabled through the coordination of the JCS. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS), as the senior ranking member of the Armed Forces, is responsible for achieving a unified strategic direction and command of the combatant forces. The CJCS is responsible for integrating land, sea, and air forces into an efficient team that is directed by the President and Secretary of Defense (Department of Defense, 2022). Also, per 10 U.S. Code 163, the President or Secretary may direct the Chairman to assist in performing their command function and as the direct communicator to and from the combatant commands. See the DoD authority visualization in figure 3.
Section 2 – Organizational Structure
A. MHS Organization Overview
The U.S. Military Health System (MHS) is organized and structured like the Department of Defense, with the authority, direction and control running from the President to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), coordinated through the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to the Combatant Commands, with combat forces provided by the Services, and defense enterprise support provided by Combat Support Agencies. First, this means that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health affairs (ASD[HA]) within the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD[P&R]) is the senior most official of the MHS that oversees health policy and defense health program budgeting, excluding warfighting health capabilities budgeted for and managed by the military Services. The Joint Staff Surgeon is responsible for coordinating all issues related to health services, to include operational medicine, force health protection, and readiness. The Combatant Commands are responsible for planning for and executing operational health services in support of Joint operations. The Services are responsible for recruiting, equipping, training, and the readiness of the medical force. Lastly, the Defense Health Agency provides a host of shared health services across the MHS, such as Military Treatment Facilities (MTFs) and pharmacy services, medical logistics, and medical research. It also supports health information technology systems for the joint force (Defense Health Agency, 2022). See the summary organizational diagram in figure 4.
B. Health Care in the U.S. & Military Health Care
The United States has a mixed public-private health care system. The U.S. Government (USG) provides funding for healthcare through Medicare for people over the age of 65, Medicaid for people with limited income, and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for uninsured children in families with modest incomes. U.S. citizens not receiving USG assistance purchase insurance on their own or through an employer. As a mixed system, it is financed in part privately and in part by the USG through taxes.
The U.S. MHS is the most comprehensive military medical enterprise in the world. The MHS has a dual mission, to care for the health and welfare of military personnel so they can accomplish their own missions, known as a “medically ready force”, and to deliver health care during a conflict, also known as delivering a “ready medical force”. The U.S. MHS is how the Military cares for its personnel, retirees, and families, as it is legally required to do (Mendez, 2021).
Section 3 – Firm Base Health System
A. Hospital Services
The U.S. MHS operates 49 hospitals or inpatient facilities (32 in the U.S.), 465 military ambulatory care and occupational health facilities (373 in the U.S.), 192 dental clinics (149 in the U.S.), and 250 veterinary facilities (185 in the U.S.). The MHS also offers a civilian network of providers for additional health care services beyond those of the military hospitals and clinics (Defense Health Agency, 2022). See the medical facilities locations below in figure 5 (Department of Defense, 2022).
Across all these facilities, the U.S. MHS has adopted the principles of high reliability organizations with a quadruple aim of improving readiness, providing better care, providing better health, and lowering costs. The facilities offer a wide array of health capabilities which are organized into clinical communities. Clinical communities are interdisciplinary networks of MHS providers who aim to provide the best patient care possible in their field. The communities include Behavioral Health, Neuromusculoskeletal, Primary Care, Women and Infant, Dental, Critical Care/Trauma, Surgical Services, Oncology, Cardiovascular, Complex Pediatrics, and Military-Specific Care (Department of Defense, 2021). Two model MTFs to highlight are Landstuhl Regional Medical Center and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.
The Walter Reed National Military Medical Center is the world’s largest joint military medical center. It has over 2.4 million square feet of clinical space that provides services to more than 1 million beneficiaries a year (Department of Defense, 2022). The flagship of U.S. military medicine, it is also known as the “President’s Hospital” or the “Nations Medical Center”. Over the years the Nations Medical Center has served every President of the United States, members of Congress, the Supreme Court, and other U.S. leaders. The facility is pictured in figure 6.
The Landstuhl Regional Medical Center is a center of gravity for quality, compassionate, and safe care in Germany. Medical-surgical teams at Landstuhl have saved the lives of wounded warriors from Africa, the Middle East, and Europe. The facility and its teams have helped advance en-route care and surgical care through innovative changes to plasma transfer and extracorporeal life support. Landstuhl has also hosted rotations of civilian surgeons (Pellerin, 2012). The facility is pictured in figure 7.
B. Healthcare beneficiaries
The U.S. MHS, through the TRICARE program, serves approximately 9.6 million beneficiaries. See the table below for details (Defense Health Agency, 2022).
Type of Beneficiary | Approximate Number of Beneficiaries |
Active-Duty Service Members | 1.41 million |
Active-Duty Family Members | 1.64 million |
National Guard and Reserve Members | 230,000 |
Family Members of National Guard and Reserve Members | 830,000 |
Retirees and Family Members <65 | 3.17 million |
Retirees and Family Members ≥65 | 2.34 million |
Table 1 - MHS Beneficiaries
The U.S. MHS saw the following number of admissions, visits, births, and prescriptions filled in 2020 (Defense Health Agency, 2022).
Type of Care | Annual Workload Summary |
Inpatient Admissions |
|
Outpatient Visits |
|
Births |
|
Prescriptions Filled |
|
Emergency Department Visits |
|
Table 2 - MHS Patient Care Numbers
C. Military Medical Research capabilities
In general, the U.S. MHS uses a coordinated, “requirements-driven,” life cycle approach to investment in medical research. Research funds are awarded competitively based on formal requirements to researchers in the biomedical community and civilian academic institutions. Research is guided by MHS staff on multidisciplinary committees and is informed by MHS clinical communities most closely associated with the research program.
See the abridged list of Military Medical Research and Funding organizations that enable Civilian-Military collaboration broken out below.
1. Civilian-Military Research Collaboration bodies:
- U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command (MRDC; https://mrdc.amedd.army.mil)
- Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP; https://cdmrp.army.mil/aboutus)
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS; https://www.usuhs.edu)
- Air Force Medical Service (AFMS) and Clinical Investigation Facilities or Clinical Research Divisions (https://www.airforcemedicine.af.mil)
- Naval Medical Research and Development Laboratories (https://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmrc/Pages/Laboratories.aspx)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA; https://www.darpa.mil)
For example, the first body in the abridged list, the U.S. Medical Research and Development Command (MRDC) is the arm of the Army responsible for medical research, development, and acquisition. Headquartered in Fort Detrick, MD, it has a global footprint with eight subordinate commands around the world (see figure 8 below). The medical research labs study chemical and biological defense, combat casualty care, and clinical medicine. The MRDC directs an expansive external research program in cooperation with academia, industry, and other government organizations (U.S. Army, 2022).
Through this collaboration, U.S. MHS research has resulted in portable products and procedures that broadly benefit medical communities. The following table of Knowledge and Materiel Products resulting from Department of Defense funded research and development in Trauma and Intensive Care gives an example of important contributions of U.S. MHS research outcomes to civilian medicine (Rasmussen, Kellermann, & Rauch, 2020).
2. Trauma and Intensive Care Research:
It is important to note that MHS medical research is not exclusively a requirements-driven process. The Department of Defense also sets aside funding for the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) to conduct “investigator-initiated” research. As the U.S.’s leadership academy for military health, USUHS plays a pivotal role in conducting research. Housed in the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, USUHS partners with military medical centers and civilian universities around the world.
3. Military Medicine Academic Journals
The U.S. MHS is built on a foundation of data transparency and an integrated and collaborative health care delivery system. A part of that foundation is the Military medicine academic Journals, with novel and relevant biomedical research, that have been developed. One example is the U.S. Army’s The Medical Journal. It is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, professional journal that is distributed worldwide (U.S. Army, 2022). Another example is the Military Medicine journal. It is the official international journal of AMSUS, the Society of Federal Health Professionals. Military Medicine aims to provide a space to discuss problems relevant to government health care.
Articles and citations from The Medical Journal (link) and Military Medicine are also compiled into PubMed (link), the National Library of Medicine’s journal citation database, which has over 34 million citations and abstracts (National Institute of Health, 2022).
Section 4 – Operational Capabilities
A. Overview of Operational Military Medicine Concepts
High-level U.S. MHS Operational Medicine concepts and doctrine are available to the public online. For example, the Joint Concept for Health Services and Joint Publication (JP) 4-02, Joint Health Services, two fundamental guiding documents for Operational Medicine, are found here and here.
Operational Medicine has four main components, (1) generating and conserving the force, (2) posturing the force, (3) protecting the force, and (4) enterprise support. Generating and conserving the force includes activities that ensure individual medical/health readiness for operations, such as education, training, treatment, and preventative care. Posturing the force includes activities that govern the disposition and state of medical capabilities that support Combatant Commands, such as partner engagement, medical logistics, and facility locations. Protecting the force includes activities to defend a healthy individual, unit, and base, such as health surveillance, public health, or protective equipment. Enterprise support activities are those that develop and maintain the force, such as research and development, financial management, and acquisition.
B. Medical Operational Capabilities
From point of injury (POI) to recovery at a hospital providing definitive care, the U.S. MHS delivers a breadth of Medical Operational capabilities across its Services. See figure 9 for a detailed breakdown.
The U.S. and many of its allies use roles of care in doctrine to describe battlefield medical capabilities. The abbreviated U.S. MHS roles are:
- Role 1 – First Responder Care: this level of care is the first medical care received by the injured party, be it buddy aid, a medic, or self-aid.
- Role 2 – Forward Resuscitative Care: this level of care provides advanced trauma management and emergency medical treatment, typically considered to be a highly mobile treatment facility.
- Role 3 – Theater Hospitalization: this level of care is provided in a military treatment facility (MTFs) that is staffed and equipped to provide care to all categories of patients.
- Role 4 – Definitive Care: this level of care is provided in U.S.-based hospitals and robust overseas MTFs.
Across these four levels of care, the U.S. has unique and comprehensive medical capabilities. The United States Air Force (USAF) aeromedical evacuation (AE) system is one of these unique capabilities. The AE system is integral not only to military evacuation, but also to the U.S. National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) and civil-military operations. USAF AE is the only entity in the world capable of safely transporting large numbers of patients over long distances at all levels of criticality (Bruce R. Guerdan, 2011). In U.S. military operations overseas, or in the case of a natural disaster at home, the USAF AE has the sole responsibility to move mass numbers of casualties outside of combat zones or affected areas.
The 379th Expeditionary Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron (EAES) is a unit that is a part of the AE system. Soldiers in the 379th are qualified to convert the C-17 Globemaster III, C-130 Hercules and KC-135 Stratotanker aircraft into a flying hospital. The 379th EAES often provides short-notice, urgent in-flight care with a survival rate of over 99%, transporting patients from U.S. Central Command to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar (Perdue, 2020).
C. Overseas & Operational Deployments
The U.S. sustains the most active-duty troops abroad of any country in the world, with over 175,000 overseas as of 2022 (Central Intelligence Agency, 2022):
5,000 Africa; | 65,000 Europe; | 125 Philippines; |
1,700 Australia; | 150 Greenland; | 26,500 South Korea; |
250 Diego Garcia; | 6,200 Guam; | 200 Singapore; |
150 Canada; | 370 Honduras; | 100 Thailand. |
650 Cuba; | 56,000 Japan; | |
290 Egypt; | 15,000 Middle East; |
The U.S. places its troops using a global force management framework in support of strategic guidance to conduct military operations, peace keeping missions, aid in disaster relief, and foster multi-National cooperation.
1. Overseas Contingency Operations
Of the overseas contingency operations conducted from 2021 to 2022, there are two particularly high visibility operations that U.S. Armed Forces have led: Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) and Operation Allies Refuge (DoD Inspector General, 2021).
OIR is the name of the U.S. military effort to intervene and defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). Started in 2014, this ongoing military operation is mainly led by U.S. air power in support of national allies like the Iraqi security forces and Syrian Democratic Forces.
Operation Allies Refuge is the name of the U.S. military effort that led to the largest airlift in U.S. history of over 120,000 U.S. citizens, Afghans, and other foreign allies (Nicole Gaouette, 2021). As Kabul and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan fell to the Taliban in August of 2021, Afghan citizens, foreign citizens, and U.S. and NATO forces searched for a swift and safe exit. It became a point of multi-national collaboration with over 30 countries supporting the evacuation.
The U.S. Military Health System (MHS) played a key role in the evacuation by providing care to fleeing Afghans and allies. The Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, highlighted in Section 3, supported more than 35,000 Afghan refugees with primary, preventative, and emergency care. The U.S. MHS overcame the supply, logistical, security, and cultural challenges that come with a rapid influx of patience and provided accommodating, committed, and effective care at Landstuhl and other hospitals during the evacuations (Freeman, 2022).
Overseas contingency operations can take many forms, including a multinational, interagency global health engagement to provide public health assistance. The Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak of late 2013 was a tragic example of this. EVD swiftly overwhelmed the medical capabilities of Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea, and much of the international emergency medicine community. This spurred more than 2,000 DoD personnel in support of Operation United Assistance (OUA) to deploy to Liberia’s capital, Monrovia. OUA led the fight against EVD by testing Ebola samples, constructing treatment units, and providing logistical support and training to national medical response, showing the Department of Defense’s (DoD) ability to answer to a unique, international operation (Joint and Coalition Operational Analysis (JCOA), 2016).
2. Disaster Relief
The U.S. military provides disaster relief around the globe. It is a core capability of the DoD. Typically done in assistance to other U.S. Government agencies, the operation is known as Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR).
The Department has shown its positive impact on disaster response both at home and abroad:
- Philippine typhoon in 2013 – U.S. military partnered with the Philippine military and provided essential medical treatment and supplies.
- Nepal earthquake in 2015 – U.S. military provided transportation, medical treatment, and training exercises to support host nation capacity to respond to the crisis.
- U.S. North Carolina hurricane in 2018 – Over 12,000 active and reserve U.S. military forces conducted rescue operations, transportation services, and delivered vital supplies.
The DoD is poised to provide disaster relief support when Nations request assistance. The engagements provide irreplaceable hands-on experience and a unique humanitarian mission. The value of multi-national, partnership-building disaster relief support has been proven as partner Nations display improved disaster response capabilities after joining U.S. Military exercises (Defense Health Agency, 2022).
3. Multi-National Military Medical Organizations
The DoD has a long-standing history of global health engagement to maintain a force ready to deploy anywhere in the world. The Department strengthens its global reach through joint medical exercises and health initiatives with multi-national partners. In these engagements the DoD aims to support and strengthen partner nations, improve interoperability, and improve U.S. capabilities. To that end, the U.S. is a party to a key multi-National military medical organization through NATO (Defense Health Agency, 2022).
Since its founding in 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has developed a robust Military Medical arm. The NATO Centre of Excellence for Military Medicine in Hungary, the Multinational Medical Coordination Centre/European Medical Command in Germany, and the Committee of the Chiefs of Military Medical Services (COMEDS) in NATO play significant roles in facilitating international military medical collaboration, coordination, and expertise (NATO, 2022).
Section 5 – Military Medical Personnel
A. Personnel in the U.S. MHS
The U.S. MHS is one of the largest health providers in the nation, delivering care to over 9.6 million beneficiaries. The MHS provides this care through Military Treatment Facilities (MTFs) or through networks of participating civilian facilities. The MHS directly employs over 134,000 personnel across the globe, not including additional medical personnel funded by the Services, see table 4 below.
Personnel | Number MHS Funded for FY21 |
Civilian | 56,920 |
Military | Total: 77,317 Officer: 27,495 Enlisted: 42,822 |
Total | 134,237 |
Table 4 - MHS Defense Health Program Funded Personnel
B. Military Medical Recruitment
The U.S. MHS is structured such that the Service medical departments are responsible for recruiting, organizing, and training medical forces for DHA and Combatant Commanders. Therefore, the Services - Army, Air Force, and Navy - have a wide array of means and paths for recruiting the long list of medical roles available including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and audiologists.
For physicians, for example, the U.S. Military covers the high cost of medical school in exchange for a commitment to serve and provides the added benefit of unique training and experiences. Three illustrative pipelines for practitioner recruitment are (Department of Defense, 2022):
- Health Professions Scholarship Program: covers medical school costs and provides training opportunities.
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences: known as “America’s Medical School” USU provides no-cost medical school with world-class medical training and leadership development programs.
- Part-Time Service: participants in the Medical Dental Student Stipend Program, provides monthly compensation for civilian medical school in exchange for service in the Reserve or Guard.
C. Military Medical Training
1. Initial Training
Much like recruitment, the U.S. Armed Forces initial trainings and medical trainings are managed by the Services and therefore vary based on soldier branch, role, and specialty. All U.S. Services have challenging, world-class initial entry training. New recruits go through basic training to learn elementary soldiering skills, such as weapon handling, first aid, fitness, and discipline. See table 5 below for a comparison of duration and locations of Service initial entry training:
Army Basic Combat Training | Marine Corps Recruit Training | Navy Boot Camp | Air Force Basic Military Training | Coast Guard Recruit Training |
10 weeks | 12 weeks | 7-9 weeks | 8.5 weeks | 8 weeks |
Fort Benning Fort Benning, Ga.
Fort Jackson Columbia, S.C.
Fort Knox Louisville, Ky.
Fort Leonard Wood Waynesville, Mo.
Fort Sill Lawton, Okla. | Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island Parris Island, S.C.
Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego | Great Lakes Recruit Training Depot Great Lakes, Ill. | Lackland Air Force Base San Antonio | Cape May Coast Guard Training Center Cape May, N.J. |
Table 5 - U.S. Service Basic Training Comparison
Doctors in the U.S. MHS do not have to participate in basic training but typically require some initial military training. In the Army, for example, instead of attending basic training physicians participate in Army Medical Basic Officer Leadership Course (BOLC), a 10–14-week course that covers basic soldiering skills and provides an orientation to the MHS.
Specialty military training naturally follows basic training. For example, after completing basic training, enlisted Army soldiers contracted as medics go to the Combat Medic Specialist Training Program, a 16-week course in Fort Sam Houston, TX. Likewise for the other services, for which details on advanced training programs and training facilities can be found on Service specific publicly available web sites.
2. Collective Training & Exercises
The U.S. MHS uses military exercises to put training into practice. Military exercises simulate wartime operations as their realistic, complex scenarios train and test units on their readiness and preparedness for mobilizations. The U.S. MHS uses medical exercises to practice operational procedures, integrate units, and refine war plans.
For example, on an annual basis the U.S. MHS hosts a culminating Military medical training event for physicians called the Joint Emergency Medicine Exercise (JEMX) at the Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center in Fort Hood. The exercise trains and tests medical personnel in combat casualty care, aeromedical evacuation, and surgical care. This joint, multi-national exercise has over 2,000 participants with more than 60 medical specialties (LT Patrick R Engelbert, 2020).
The DoD fosters the connection between global health and global security by developing overseas joint international medical training exercises. For example, the U.S. has planned and is executing Medical Readiness Exercises (MEDREX) in Africa with partner Nations. The MEDREX intends to enable U.S. forces to train in unfamiliar environments, share medical procedures and enhance host nation surgery and trauma response. In the exercises the U.S. will partner with Angola, Morocco, Senegal, Ghana, Chad, South Africa, Kenya, and Rwanda (Department of State, 2022).
In November of 2022, the U.S. Army Southern European Task Force, Africa, in partnership with Angolan Armed Forces, completed a two week MEDREX at the Principle Military Hospital in Luanda. The event was the first of its kind in Angola, and strengthened partnerships between the medical teams and provided critical care to approximately 60 patients (Thompson, 2022).
Section 6 – Civilian-Military Relations
A. Formal Civ-Mil Agreements
The Department of Defense (DoD) is committed to providing the highest levels of support for public health and domestic crisis. Formal agreements are in place at multiple levels to enable federal, state, local, and territorial interoperability, and collaboration. For example, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has established the National Response Framework (NRF) to guide national responses to all emergencies. The NRF spells out specific Emergency Support Functions (ESF) that define coordinating structures for emergencies for the interagency, built on the scalable concepts of the FEMA National Incident Management System (NIMS) (FEMA, 2022).
Beneath those broad frameworks, there are also interagency partnerships like the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS). The NDMS is a partnership between DoD and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of Veteran’s Affairs to develop unified responses to natural and man-made disaster needs (Defense Health Agency, 2022). These partnerships rely on military capabilities, like USAF AE, to transport and care for large numbers of complex patients, to fully support citizens in their time of need.
B. COVID-19 as an Example of Civ-Mil Coordination
The DoD is still working closely with HHS, DHS, and the State Department to protect and support the American people in the National and international response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Responding early and effectively, the DoD was the first U.S. Government Agency to restrict movement from China. Then, shortly after the World Health Organization officially identified the virus, the DoD provided 200 beds for State Department officials evacuating Wuhan, China. In early 2020 the DoD was swift to support HHS, providing four evacuee installations and eleven funnel airports to enable thousands of repatriations.
Throughout the pandemic the DoD provided testing capabilities, supplemented civilian education forces, procured respirator masks, deployed strategic medical equipment reserves, enabled rapid vaccine development, built alternate care facilities, deployed combat support hospitals, and deployed the USNS Comfort and USNS Mercy ships (Department of Defense, 2022).
The Department also leveraged its history of global health engagement to address this modern crisis. The DoD used a modified evacuation method, developed initially for Ebola patients in 2014, to safely transport COVID-19 patients amid the pandemic. When loaded with the Transportation Isolation System (TIS), patients can receive care and the crew are protected in the Air Force’s C-130 Hercules and C-17 Globemaster III (Correll, 2020).
Section 7 – U.S. Military Medical History
A. Abridged Summary of U.S. Military Medical History
There is a long, storied, and celebrated history behind today’s U.S. Military Health System (MHS). There have been Medal of Honor recipients, groundbreaking medical discoveries and research, and major transformations in its history books. Over time the U.S. MHS has grown and changed in concert with advances and innovations in medical treatment, communications technologies, logistics, and travel. Changes in those areas have coincided with the general centralization of medical health services and capabilities. From the civil war, to WWI, WWII and beyond, the U.S. Military Health System has slowly shifted from exclusively providing organic, field medical assets to developing a more comprehensive capability with centralized, “general” medical assets with unified casualty collection and treatment, while still maintaining the ability to rapidly deploy and support in a decentralized manner.
Since the initial development of formal care programs for service members and their families in the 1950s and 60s, the U.S. MHS has continued to evolve its capabilities and benefits. Even recent history shows the MHS undergoing two major transformations. The first change is a once in a generation reform effort of the management of Military Treatment Facilities. Previously administered and managed by the Army, Navy, and Air Force, Military hospitals and clinics now fall under the responsibility of the Defense Health Agency. This transformative effort began in 2018 and the process is enabling standardization, improving dissemination of best practices, and increasing overall access to care across the MHS. The second transformation is the MHS’s new electronic health record system. Dubbed MHS GENESIS, the new system is providing a single health record that is interoperable across the continuum of care using enhanced and secure technology (Defense Health Agency, 2022).
As the U.S. MHS looks at the past to improve care for the future, they rely on Military historians. The National Museum of Health and Medicine is not Service specific and takes a comprehensive look at American Military medicine. The museum offers a unique opportunity for visitors because it is one of the few places that the public can see the effects of disease on the human body. The museum has interactive displays, historic artifacts, and much more. Learn more here: National Museum of Health and Medicine | Health.mil
In addition to the comprehensive perspective of the National Museum of Health and Medicine, the U.S. has branch specific historians and resources as well. Their websites can be found here:
- Air Force Medical Service History & Heritage: History & Heritage (af.mil)
- Navy Medicine History: Navy Medicine
- Army Medical Corps History: The History of the U.S. Army Medical Service Corps - U.S. Army Center of Military History
References
- Bruce R. Guerdan, M. M. (2011). United States Air Force Aeromedical Evacuation - A Critical Disaster Response Resource. American Journal of Clinical Medicine, 153-156.
- Central Intelligence Agency. (2022, June 20). The World Fact Book: Military Deployments. Retrieved from CIA Web Site: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/military-deployments/
- Correll, D. S. (2020, April 13). Air Force C-17 evacuates three Americans with coronavirus out of Afghanistan. AirForceTimes.
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, June 15). Defense Health Agency. Retrieved from Defense Health Website: https://www.health.mil/About-MHS/MHS-Elements
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, June 20). DHA: Global Health Engagement. Retrieved from Military Health System Official Website: https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Health-Readiness/Global-Health-Engagement
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, June 20). DHA: Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief. Retrieved from Military Health System Web site: https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Health-Readiness/Global-Health-Engagement/Humanitarian-Assistance-and-Disaster-Relief?type=External+Articles#RefFeed
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, June 16). MHS Health Facilities. Retrieved from Military Health System Official Website: https://health.mil/I-Am-A/Media/Media-Center/MHS-Health-Facilities
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, June 16). MHS Patients by Beneficiary Category. Retrieved from Official Website of the Military Health System: https://health.mil/I-Am-A/Media/Media-Center/Patient-Population-Statistics/Patients-by-Beneficiary-Category
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, June 21). MHS: Civil Support. Retrieved from Military Health System Web site: https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Health-Readiness/Civil-Military-Medicine/Civil-Support
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, 06 28). MHS: Initiatives & Areas of Impact. Retrieved from MHS Web site: https://cms.health.mil/About-MHS/MHS-Initiatives
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, June 16). Patient Care Numbers for the Military Health System. Retrieved from Official Website of the Military Health System: https://health.mil/I-Am-A/Media/Media-Center/Patient-Care-Numbers-for-the-MHS
- Defense Health Agency. (2022, June 15). TRICARE eligibility. Retrieved from TRICARE official website: https://www.tricare.mil/eligibility
- Department of Defense. (2021). Evaluation of the TRICARE Program: Fiscal Year 2021 Report to Congress. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government.
- Department of Defense. (2022, June 16). About Us: Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Retrieved from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Website: https://walterreed.tricare.mil/About-Us/Facilities/Facts-at-a-Glance
- Department of Defense. (2022, June 15). About: U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved from Department of Defense Web Site: https://www.defense.gov/About/
- Department of Defense. (2022, June 20). Applying: Medicine & the Military. Retrieved from Medicine & the Military Web site: https://www.medicineandthemilitary.com/applying-and-what-to-expect
- Department of Defense. (2022, June 15). Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Retrieved from Joint Chiefs of Staff Web site: https://www.jcs.mil/About/The-Joint-Staff/Chairman/
- Department of Defense. (2022, June 21). DoD Coronavirus: Timeline. Retrieved from Department of Defense Web site: https://www.defense.gov/Spotlights/Coronavirus-DOD-Response/Timeline/
- Department of Defense. (2022, June 16). Military Medical Facilities Map. Retrieved from Medicine and the Military: https://www.medicineandthemilitary.com/career-and-lifestyle/military-medical-facilities-map
- Department of State. (2022, June 20). Digital Briefing on Medical Readiness (MEDREX) Program and CDE. Retrieved from Department of State Web site: https://www.state.gov/digital-briefing-on-medical-readiness-medrex-program-and-cde/
- Department of the Army. (1997). Army Regulation 350-28. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense.
- DoD Inspector General. (2021). FY2022 Comprehensive Oversight Plan Overseas Contingency Operations. Alexandria, VA: Department of Defense.
- FEMA. (2022, June 21). FEMA: National Response Framework. Retrieved from FEMA Web site: https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/national-preparedness/frameworks/response#esf
- Freeman, L. (2022, January 6). How the Military Medical Forces Supported Afghanistan Evacuation. Health.mil News.
- James Siebens, R. L. (2021, July 14). Stimson: US Global Force Posture and US Military Operations Short of War. Retrieved from The Stimson Center Web Site: https://www.stimson.org/2021/us-global-force-posture-and-us-military-operations-short-of-war/
- Joint and Coalition Operational Analysis (JCOA). (2016). Operation United Assistance: The DoD Response to Ebola in West Africa. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense.
- LT Patrick R Engelbert, M. U. (2020). The Joint Emergency Medicine Exercise: A Capstone Training Evolution of a Military Unique Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents. Military Medicine, 544-548.
- Mendez, B. (2021). Military Medical Care: Frequently Asked . Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
- National Institute of Health. (2022, June 16). PubMed Overview. Retrieved from National Library of Medicine Website: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/
- NATO. (2022, June 20). NATO: Military medical support. Retrieved from NATO Web site: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49168.htm#:~:text=The%20Committee%
20of%20the%20Chiefs%20of%20Military%20Medical,relief%20and%20humanitarian
%20operations%20became%20vital%20for%20NATO. - Nicole Gaouette, J. H. (2021, August 31). The last US military planes have left Afghanistan, marking the end of the United States’ longest war. CNN.
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (2022). Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government.
- Pellerin, C. (2012). Landstuhl Regional Medical Center saves lives, advances medicine. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Press Service.
- Perdue, A. (2020, October 15). Air Force Unit provides worldwide medical response capability. Health.mil News.
- Rasmussen, T. E., Kellermann, A. L., & Rauch, T. M. (2020). A Primer on the Military Health System’s Approach to Medical Research and Development. Academic Medicine, 1652-1657.
- Thompson, M. D. (2022, November 29). U.S., Angola conclude inaugural military medical exercise. Retrieved from U.S. Army Southern European Task Force Africa: https://www.setaf-africa.army.mil/article/30733/us-angola-conclude-inaugural-military-medical-exercise
- U.S. Army. (2022, June 16). About The Medical Journal. Retrieved from U.S. Army Medical Center of Excellence: https://medcoe.army.mil/the-medical-journal
- U.S. Army. (2022, June 28). USAMRDC Introduction. Retrieved from USAMRDC Web Site: https://mrdc.amedd.army.mil/
(Status: 21 March 2023)